Skip to main content
Professional

Methodology

Years of studying English, and still not speaking it

Most of the adults who come to Professional have studied English before. School, university, sometimes a course or a private tutor on top of that. The words look familiar, the rules were covered at some point, but saying anything alive just does not happen.

The school has been working with exactly these people since 2008. The approach that grew out of it is not what you would call fashionable. But it is logical, consistent and tested by eighteen years of practice.

Five principles

  • Grammar is explained, not picked up

    After fourteen years of intuition alone, intuition is no longer enough. An adult needs to understand how the language is built: why a sentence is put together this way, which tense to choose, where the auxiliary verb goes and how one structure differs from another. So grammar is taken apart in detail, with examples that make sense.

  • Translation drills — and the school knows how that sounds

    The standard objection: translation trains you to think in your native language. In reality that habit is already there. An adult beginner translates in their head anyway, they simply do it unnoticed and with no control at all. A translation drill brings that process into the open, where it can be seen and corrected. Translation here is not the goal but the tool: it shows how the two language systems differ from each other.

  • The snowball principle

    Every new topic rests on the previous ones. Simple sentences first, then they grow more complex both in vocabulary and in grammar. Nothing covered disappears: grammar keeps coming back in new tasks and is repeated in new contexts until it starts working on its own. From a certain point on, even discussing grammar in the group switches to English.

  • Simpler is stronger than more complex

    The most common trap: people try to speak English as intricately as they speak their own language. They build a long thought, translate it word by word in their head, get tangled up and go quiet. So we teach not only grammar but the skill of simplifying speech without simplifying the meaning. A few clean, clear sentences are stronger than one complex one lost halfway through. Variety comes later, and it comes by itself.

  • Listening is not enough — you have to give back

    Retellings, home reading, film discussions, transcribing audio. Students do not just absorb the language, they use it constantly.

Bottlenecks of English Grammar

Our own coursebook

The school never found a ready-made coursebook that gave it what it needed. So it wrote its own.

The current one is called Bottlenecks of English Grammar. Before it there was the Blue Book, then the Orange Book, then the Big Orange Book, or simply BOB. Four editions in eighteen years, and each new one appeared because the lessons themselves made it visible which exercise was not working and what was missing.

Only a handful of schools write their own coursebooks: it is an enormous amount of work that never pays for itself directly. So what a student opens in their first lesson is not somebody else’s theory. It is eighteen years of corrections, made with real groups.

Today the coursebook holds translation exercises on core grammar from A1 to B2.

What a lesson looks like

Grammar is the foundation, but the course is not limited to grammar lessons. In class and at home, students:

  • listen to audio and transcribe it at home, writing down what they hear word by word
  • write reproductions: first they listen to a text and work through it, then they reproduce it in writing in English
  • read books as part of their home reading and retell what they have read
  • watch films and discuss the plot, the characters and the questions the films raise
  • learn idioms and set expressions
  • do interactive tasks in Quizlet and Wordwall
  • learn to ask questions, keep a conversation going and argue their point

Listening deserves a separate word. Simply playing a recording and checking the answers is not enough. When a student transcribes audio at home, they start hearing endings, contractions, words running together and familiar words in unfamiliar shapes. What used to be a continuous stream of sound breaks down into separate parts.

Quizlet helps revise vocabulary regularly, Wordwall reinforces grammar, and materials, homework and day-to-day organisation are gradually moving to Kalyna, a Ukrainian platform for language schools. But no platform has ever taught anyone a language on its own. Technology works only when it becomes part of the system rather than replacing it.

How long this actually takes

Cambridge English publishes guidelines for how many learning hours it takes to reach each level. These are cumulative hours from zero, not hours for a single level.

Level: A2
Learning hours: 180–200 hours
Level: B1
Learning hours: 350–400 hours
Level: B2
Learning hours: 500–600 hours
Level: C1
Learning hours: 700–800 hours
Level: C2
Learning hours: 1000–1200 hours

Source: Cambridge English, guided learning hours

In other words, the road from zero to a confident B2 is roughly 500–600 hours of lessons. That is exactly why promises of fluent English in a month have nothing in common with how a language skill is actually formed.

The format of your studies has to survive that distance. It must be not only effective but also financially sustainable over several years.

What the school does not promise

  • It does not promise fluent English in a month.
  • It does not promise you will speak without grammar.
  • It does not promise you will learn the language in your sleep or in the background.
  • It does not promise results without homework.

A language takes time, regularity and effort. But that effort does not have to be chaotic. What it needs is a clear structure, constant revision, a grammar foundation, reading, listening, a growing vocabulary and plenty of practice. That is exactly what this methodology brings together.

See the courses